Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Generation X, Y, Z: Finding generation identity in a diary

Generation X, Y, and Z, world wars, Great Depression, Elvis Presly, Beatles, Vietnam or (American) War, Punk, Michael Jackson, dotcoms, IPhone, 9/11, Anne Frank, these are examples of events, personalities and products that somehow are able to define a generation. How can one grasp the generation's identity?

Can identity of a generation be captured by a diary? Can it constitute as knowledge? Amar Singh's diary on India during the British colonization presents a subjective knowledge of a colonial on the political domination and racial superiority of Englishmen. Amar wrote regularly on his diary from 1898 to 1942, around 44 years of keeping notes of his experiences and observations. The rich articulation of the entries on the diary is argued to define the identity formation of the Indians at that time under the English empire.

The debate on social sciences about subjective and objective knowledge is situated in the "self-as-other" ethnography. There has been primacy of objective knowledge as scientific borne out of a rigorous method applied by the social scientists. However, the subjective knowledge that anthropologists gather from their key informants and their participant-observation is getting acceptance as another form of knowledge that is as valuable to social sciences as objective knowledge. The epistemological claim of the subjective knowledge is that some well-placed individuals are carriers of the truth and reality of a generation that is of interest to social sciences.

In social sciences, there is a continued blurring of self and other, participant and observer, subjective and objective. The reflexive self can be the other as the reflexive participant can be the observer. So the subjective knowledge is as valid as the objective knowledge in social sciences.

Thus, Amar Sing's diary counts as subjective knowledge that portrays the identity formation of colonial Indians. This portrayal is "liminal" which means that the identity formed is not a combination of English and Indian at one time. It is either Indian or English in one time, neither the two mixing together. The shift from one culture to the other is made possible by acceptance of this "liminality."

This subjective knowledge presented by Amar Singh's diary on identity formation of colonial Indians has contributed to the enrichment of understanding of what constitutes knowledge in the social sciences. A diary can capture the identity of a generation as Amar Singh did in his diary.

Saturday, June 19, 2010

World Cup, Football: A unifying force

The world shares its passion for one sports, football. And Indonesia is one with the world, in football, the most popular sports in the world. Although without a national team competing in the World Cup 2010 in South Africa, Indonesians are closely following the updates and games with passion. It is the sports, not a team, that creates a certain sense of belongingness and ownership.

For example, during the 2008 Euro Cup finals between Spain and Germany, Indonesia was awake and glued to TV. The time was 12 midnight in Jakarta until the early morning of Monday last week. Men and women, boys and girls, young and old, football has captured the imagination of Indonesians.

Binaya (co-intern in Asean) and I favored Germany to win the prestigious Cup. I had my own reason; I don’t know about his. I simply liked Germany. I thought I had enough of Spain (well, it colonized the Philippines for four centuries).

Earlier that day, the Philippines watched the Las Vegas, USA show of Manny Pacquiao overwhelming David Diaz for the WBC lightweight title for his fourth titles in different weight divisions. It was late in the morning, approaching noontime in the Philippines. Manny Pacquaio has captured the fantasy of Filipinos.

Manny Pacquiao in the US for the Philippines; football in Europe for Indonesia. Two countries in one region, two sports, two colonial continents.

A person embodying national craze in the sports, or even bigger than any sports in the Philippines, for the Philippines; a sports embodying national passion for Indonesia.

In my Monday morning “ojek” (motorcycle) ride to busway, “Yakob” asked me, “Did you watch TV yesterday?”

I said, “tidak (no).”

“Oh, Spain won,” Yakob declared gleefully.

I thought he was referring to the Pacquiao – Diaz bout. I thought he was a die-hard fan of Pacquaio.

And so I thought. But he is an Indonesian, after all. Football reigns supreme in the country among all sports. That makes Indonesia one with Europe and the world.

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Sons of the Motherland (In Memory of the Young Martyrs)

The following has been written 10 years ago. When I was skimming my old notes, I found this. I thought this would serve better if I shared it unadulterated with the readers. This was printed in a local newspaper in Bicol in 2000.

“Youth is to all the glad season of life; but often only by what it hopes, not by what it attains, or what it escapes.” – (Thomas Carlyle)

Two driving forces why things change are the curiosity and discontent of the young as opposed to the prevalent resistance to change of the aged.

Youth can be a state of the mind. People remain young if they hold on to their ideals, an ingredient that can make nations great; if the youth keeps their enthusiasm to power their nations forward; if they display vigor which springs hope for a better tomorrow.

Youth speaks.

Today I live in a society where oppressive systems are deeply rooted and wholly accepted. My forefathers who fought hard to regain freedom from foreign intrusion forgot to follow it up with its price – vigilance. Our society has somehow evolved to its present state, still I hardly can call my own. Most, if not all, features are borrowed, save the person, but the lifestyles, educational system, music, literature can be taced back to the colonizers of our land.

Our youth is blazing the trail of globalization losing his/her own identity, engulfing him/herself in a strange body and being, betraying his/her true roots, and selling his/her bare soul. None of a character of own. I dread to witness the day coming when no youth can identify with Bonifacio, Del Pilar, Silang, Sakay, the Katipuneros; I dread the day.

Faced with the impending fall of our own beloved nation in the hands of the glutton and inept system, I am up to the challenge of engaging myself to the struggle of the oppressed. I can always contribute to the revolutionary change our society needs. I am going to break the conventionals and formalities that have been impeding our creative and imaginative minds, pulling us down to the abyss of ignorance, conformity and poverty. I will crush the influence of imperialism, even the slightest shade of it to take the consciousness of our fellow youth to the new heights and level where it can lead to self-determination. I will go and grow with them liberated from the bondage of the past and present chains to see and reflect and examine our being. These I all do in the name of common good, justice and equality.

Though I know one little candle light in the land is nothing but a dim light, I will not stop burning up to my last wax because I am convinced that there are other lights out there that too are burning with flame. I will pierce the darkness with my straight light and let others see the goodness and brightness of the light. Someday I am going to meet them and we all will give light and warm to others and then, build a society founded in equality, justice and common good, based on a culture that is ours, understood by all in a language native to our tongue. Then it will be a society truly of our own.

This is the society I dream. Can’t we have the same dream?

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

King of tennis: Federer or Nadal?

Roger Federer's exit in the French Open does not diminish his tennis career achievements. However, French Open has solidified Rafael Nadal's exploits on the clay-court. Nadal won the French Open for the fifth time and regained the number one ranking in men's tennis from Federer.

This leads us to be excited about the Wimbledon Open. It is undoubtedly Frederer's playground because he has won there for six times. Thus, making him the top-seed in the coming tournament.

I would say that Federer is the king of tennis, for now. Why?

For winning his fourth Australian Open and 16th Grand Slam title, the Swiss tennis superstar, Roger Federer, established himself as peerless among tennis greats and players. The 28-year old Federer etched his place in tennis history as one of the greatest players, if not the greatest, to ever play the sports. He beat Andy Murray to secure the title in three straight sets of his 22nd career Grand Slam final appearance.

What is more amazing is that he has a lot of tennis years ahead of him. He can achieve more and totally separate himself from the mortals of the sports. And the year has just begun.

The previous record of 14 Grand Slam titles of the American Pete Sampras was seemed to be beyond the reach of any tennis players when he retired in 2003. Federer made the record humanly possible and breakable in one tennis career.

Just like in any sports, greatness does not come without fierce competition from a worthy rival who brings out the best in great players. Boxing legend Muhammad Ali would not be "the greatest" if not for his memorable fights with another boxing great Joe Frazier. In basketball, Magic Johnson had Larry Bird whereas in tennis, Pete Sampras had Andre Agassi.

In Federer's time, Spaniard Rafael Nadal has emerged as his toughest challenge in the run for Grand Slam titles. In fact, it was last year in the Australian Open that Federer was denied by Nadal to match the Sampras' record of 14 Grand Slam titles. In turn in the succeeding Grand Slam event, he denied Nadal of his 4th consecutive French Open title. That was fitting for Federer to match the Sampras' record and winning his first clay-court French Open, plus he won all the Grand Slam events in various surfaces. Then, he defended the Wimbledon crown in grass court to surpass the record at 15 titles.

What is there for Federer to achieve further in his tennis career? I think there is more for him to stay in competitive tennis to elevate the intensity and level of playing of the sports. He is now the role model for aspiring tennis players. He exudes composure under intense competition and challenge, humility amidst his achievements, and provides the sports an iconic face and name.

Federer is king of tennis. Doubtless, he will remain as such for a long time. Let us see more of him and enjoy his showcase of talents, skills and character in and off the court. That is truly very kingly. But like any other king, he has a rival. Rafa Nadal is a very worth competitor and rival for the crown. What an exciting era for tennis!

It's the economy, not you, is recovering

There are positive indications that economic recovery is well underway. The good signs have descended unto the housing market and unemployment data. But investors are still wary of the temporariness of the rebound. The
economy is not out of the woods yet.

The housing crisis that started the whole mess in the global economy has posted relieving figures after two years of dismal and disheartening data. Home sales are up and foreclosures are on the decline. Construction of new housing projects is starting ti prop up to show that confidence in the housing market is holding.

For the first time in 15 months, the unemployment rate dipped and fewer people lost their jobs than the previous month. It defied the prediction that unemployment rate will reach double digits this year. If the new trend continues to hold, then unemployment will hover around 9%. This will be a safe figure to start the year of 2010 when full recovery is said to happen.

The stock market has reacted positively in the new development. Some giant companies such as AIG posted profits in the quarter to boast the confidence of investors in the market. Although there is still an air of wariness and caution, the sense of doom and despair is out of the horizon. Optimism and bright prospects dominate the landscapes of economy.

Now, analysts and economists are looking at the consumers' behavior. They know that the consumers will have to do their part in helping the economy recover. Consumer spending is still conservative as more people opt to put their money on the banks for safekeeping in the future. The fear of sudden loss of jobs and insecurity is imminent in the faces of consumers. But there is a confidence that consumers will respond to the needs of the economy. They will ultimately spend their money because that's what they have gotten used with.

The cash for clunkers program help avert the collapse of car industries. now the car sales are on the rise. Plus, environmentally friendly cars will dot every road. It is a very good bargain, one gets cash by trading
his/her old car. In that wat, the market is stimulated because many poeple wanted to avail of the cash for replacing their old cars by hybrid cars. In this way, two heads are being hit - one is pump priming the economy and promoting environmentally friendly cars to the public.

We can look forward to a promising future because soon, the good times will be back. I am seeing it now as I buy things that I need and save more and more for a secured future.

Monday, June 14, 2010

Pacquiao-Mayweather fight still raging on

It is officially off and on, for now. Nobody knows. Notably, boxing has risen to new heights because of the fight.

The much-anticipated boxing match between Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Jr., two of the top pound-for-pound fighters, has been shelved because of disagreements in the scheduled blood testing. The fight is groomed to be the biggest in boxing with both fighters going to earn, at least, a guaranteed $25 million. The date had been set, the venue had been reserved, but the negotiation leading to the fight did not go as expected.

The camp of Mayweather strongly proposed the random and stringent blood tests for both fighters to scan a possible intake of performance-enhancing drugs or substance. It accused Pacquaio of not being "clean." It insinuated that the way Pacquaio climbed from flyweight to welterweight and won seven legitimate titles in different weight categories was a product of some external factor which was enhancing performance drug. But it never put forward any evidence to prove this.

The Pacquaio's camp agreed to have the blood testing, but not in random fashion. Pacquiao was amendable to three blood testing schedules; one would be months before the fight date, another one would be 14 days prior to the fight, and the last one would be right after the fight. According to experts and analysts on drug testing and performance-enhancing substances, there was no way to escape the findings of blood testing if it would be done right after the fight. But Mayweather insisted on the random and stringent blood tests which could be made even on the day of the fight.

For Pacquiao, blood letting on days close to the fight is a bad omen. Much worse is on the day of the fight. It was reported that Pacquiao would feel weak, just like when he fought Erik Morales the first time in the epic-trilogy in which Pacquaio lost by decision.

There will be March 13 boxing fight in Dallas, Texas. The exciting Manny Pacquaio will be top-billing the fight. But he will fight not Mayweather. He will face welterweight contender Clottey.

On the other hand, Mayweather is reportedly facing Sugar Shane Mosley in another date and venue.

Both fights are blockbusters to boxing fans. They are very promising to be a hell of a fight. But they are only a prelude to what millions of boxing fans really want to see, a Pacquaio versus Mayweather fight.

It may not happen in the near future, but I believe it has to happen in this era. It is unpardonable if boxing lets go of this great opportunity to have great fighters not testing each other's skills and chin to decide
who the pound-for-pound king truly is. The winner will definitely be on the list of the top three best boxers of all-time.

What is Enlightenment?

The title is the same question answered by Immanuel Kant's Was ist Aufklarung

in 1784. It was basically a reflection of a great thinker on his own present. At that time, present was conceived in three forms; 1) as an "era of the world distinct from the others through some inherent characteristics, " 2) a sign of a forthcoming event, 3) "a point of transition toward the dawning of a new world." And Kant departed from this conception. He saw the present as an "exit" or "way out" from the state of " immaturity" described as letting the others direct or lead in an area where one is unable to make use of his/her reason when it is called for. For example in Kant's article, when a book does the understanding for a person, that person is in a state of "immaturity." Lazinesss and cowardice are the reasons cited by Kant for this "immaturity." So he proposed a motto or instruction for Enlightenment- Aude sapere , "dare to know," or "have courage to use your own reason." For Kant, he characterized Enlightenment as both a task and obligation, individually and collectively. He also distinguished the private use of reasonand public use of reason. On one hand, when one is a "cog in a machine" or plays a role in society, he make a private use of reason in determined circumstances and ends in view. When one, on the other hand, uses reasoning as a reasonable being and for reasoning's sake, it is a public use of reason that must be free.

Foucault (1984) summarized what Kant's description of enlightenment as; " the moment when humanity is going to put its own reason to use, without subjecting itself to any authority; now it is precisely at this moment that the critique is necessary, since its role is that of defining the conditions under which the use of reason is legitimate in order to determine what can be known, what must be done, and what may be hoped..... Enlightenment is the age of the critique." This, for Foucault, characterizes the " attitude of modernity." Although modernity has been referred to as an epoch in history, sandwiched between premodernity and postmodernity, Foucault would like to picture it as an attitude rather than an epoch of history. By attitude, he meant "a mode of relating to contemporary reality; a voluntary choice made by certain people; in the end, a way of thinking and feeling; a way too of acting and behaving that at one and the same time marks a relation of belonging and presents itself as a task. A bit, no doubt, like what the Greeks called an "ethos."

Going back to Kant's description of Enlightenment as an "exit" or "way out," it is like we are inside a theater or cinema surrounded by darkness, distracted and absorbed by the reality flashed on screen different from what we know of it; but a little red sign flickers that invites us to a way out in case of fire. This fire represents the changes and ruptures of routines. Truly, it feels good to be staying forever inside a cinema. It entertains us and makes us forget our problems for a time being. Or we are just afraid to confront our own shadows that cause us prefer to hide in the darkness? Kant reminded us that the enlightened is not afraid of shadows. Being afraid of the shadows seems natural, but in reality it can be critically interrogated. To do this, it takes a philosophical attitude which Foucault propounded, a critique of who we are, an analysis of our limits imposed on us and an experiment or project of transcendental possibilities.

Protestant Ethic and Spirit of Capitalism: A review of Weber's classic

Max Weber started by citing circumstances that manifested Western civilization as the source of various developments with significant value and recognition as valid today. Some of these developments were the codification of books, rational jurisprudence, harmonious music, perspective in art, rise of a modern state with written constitution, laws and administration, among other things that had to do with astronomy, architecture, view of history, literature, etc. Included in these developments was the "most fateful force in our modern life, capitalism." He asserted that capitalism is not in any way identical with unlimited greed for gain; rather it is identical with continuous renewal of profit through continuous capitalistic enterprise. The economic action through capitalistic undertakings of continuous operations of an enterprise was differentiated from the speculative acquisition of profit from wars, piracy, exploitation of subjects, election, etc. The former was being the legal and systematic pursuit of profit. There were other things that brought about this Western capitalism such as the organization of free labor, the separation of business from the household, rational bookkeeping, the notion of personal property, rational structures of law and administration by trained officials or bureaucracy, and the utilization of scientific knowledge in modern science particularly mathematics.

Then the question as to why in the West did this exacting capitalism emerge remains unsettled to a large extent. For example, the opening of a public library, the offering of scholarships, the introduction of new
business courses in a local university, the passage of a resolution increasing the subsidy for education would not greatly explain satisfactorily the growing number of entrepreneurs in a certain town. There must be the fundamental shift in the disposition of the town folks toward business engagements to be able to explain the phenomenon and this new conduct. And Weber recognized that the magical and religious forces and the ethical ideas of duty had been the most essential influences on conduct of men/women, on the "development of economic spirit or ethos of economic system." With this, the spirit of capitalism was associated with the "rational ethics of ascetic Protestantism especially Calvinism."

Certain religious ideas such as proficiency in a calling as work, expression of virtues of honesty, frugality, punctuality, and industry, avoidance of life's pleasures, and gaining wealth as a sign of an election of the saved were informing this ethic of capitalistic culture. Weber identified traditionalism in both the laborers and entrepreneur as anti-spirit of capitalism. Traditional laborers were those of pre-capitalistic labor that was interested in earning the usual rate no matter how attractive the opportunity to earn more. The employer's wish of efficiency and high productivity by means of increased labor rate went to naught in the arms of traditional laborers. As compared with capitalistic labor, workers were responsible and released from counting the rates and income with maximum comfort and minimum effort. In this case, labor is performed as a calling. However, the traditional entrepreneurs, on one hand, were concerned with the satisfaction of needs, that is acquisition of goods necessary to meet the needs. Capitalistic entrepreneurs on the other hand acquired goods and profit untied by the limits set by needs. They sought to gain profit rationally and systematically. Traditionalism persisted for a while but the process of rationalization of areas of life destroyed it. Some features of modern economic life were the extended the productivity of labor, labor for a rational organization providing service and goods for humanity, calculated future, and direction with foresight.

While Weber's capitalism was seen as a response to Marx's analysis of capitalism and both were interested in discovering the historical causal relationship that had resulted to the current state of modern society, he however refused to consider that the materialistic view could explain every aspect of social phenomenon. In Weber's view, ideas especially religious ideas were critical aspects of action. Protestant ethic as an idea system was linked with another system of ideas, the spirit of capitalism. But he failed to link the rational action with this idea system.

Unlike Marx andDurkheim who are both optimistic in the transition to modernity, Weber rejects the Enlightenment's view of evolutionary progress and happiness. Instead, he projects a highly rational and bureaucratically organized social order, an 'iron cage' in which people are trapped. Sadly, we are supposed to be liberated by reason, Weber saw the opposite.

NBA Playoff Classic: Eight-seeded team beat the top seed

It was a historic upset in the 2007 NBA playoff season. The western conference was dominated by the Dallas Mavericks winning a franchise-record of 67 games out of the possible 82 games. As a result, the Mavericks was seeded no. 1 in the western conference. Its opponent was the lowly Golden State Warriors which won only 42 games in the regular season. Fresh from its NBA finals stint in the previous year, the experienced Mavericks was the overwhelming favorite to advance to the second round. But the Warriors had its own game plan and they delivered in six games to mark the great playoff heartbreak in the NBA.

Game 1 was played in the Mavericks' homecourt. All the advantages built by the homecourt and winning 67 games were shattered by the determined Warriors to begin the history in the making in the NBA playoff. The Warriors surprisingly won, 97-85. Living up to the expectations and high seeding in the playoff, the Mavericks bounced back in Game 2 with 112-99 victory to tie the series, 1-1. Then the series moved to the Warriors' den. Playing before a supportive and believing home crowd, the Warriors trounced the Mavericks in both Games 3 and 4 to take a commanding lead of the series, 3-1. Very few teams were able to come back after being 3-1 down in a best-of-seven series. Faced by a prospect of embarrassing exit in a once promising season, the Mavericks was able to salvage Game 5 in their homecourt to make it 3-2. Game 6 was played in the Warriors' turf. The Warriors and crowd believed that they were into a historic upset. Indeed, the Warriors demolished any hope of the Mavericks to come back in the series by beating them soundly in Game 6 before a boisterous crowd with 111-86 victory. The remarkable upset was cast and complete. The hungrier Warriors won the series, 4-2, to advance to the second round. The Mavericks were left behind wondering what hit them in the series.

If there was any consolation for the Mavericks, it would be the awarding of the NBA's Most Valuable Player (MVP) to Dirk Nowitzki. But bowing out of the playoff very early was a disappointment to the fans and the successful run in the regular season.

Indeed, only for the third time in NBA history, an 8th-seeded team beat a top-seeded team. And they beat the top seed convincingly.

Robert "Bobby" Fischer (1943 - 2008): A chess genius like no other

The man is remembered for living his life on his own way and world. He is a man to himself and to the world. Bobby Fischer passes away with chess titles and championships memorable to all who see and remember him.

Learning what happened in Iceland in January 18, 2008, I ought to write something about Fisher and his impact in my life. As a chess enthusiast, it is clear why I like the man very much. He is simply a genius in the
game of chess. In countless times, I have played his brilliant games with myself. Chess players like to beat themselves, you know. But I usually win against myself in chess. What I have learned from him extends beyond the 64-square board and blurs my view of the world as black and white.

He teaches me to love and respect books. As a young boy, Fisher would devour chess books day and night. He would seclude himself and devote almost the whole day reading and mastering chess books and all the classics in chess. For him, there is no substitute for learning chess but read. There is no substiture for learning life but live. Indeed, he lives fully well.

He guides me to have clarity among options. His games are brilliant examples of clear plan and strategies. I learn that chess is about finding the best move. It offers thousands of possible moves but there can only be one best move at a time. The challenge is to find it continuously in the shortest time possible. It assures oneself a sure winner, both in chess and in life if this is done according to rules. Certainly, Fisher would speak his mind on anything passionately. Clearly, he is a man of his own choosing, a man of his own mind.

He shows me eccentricity with conviction. There are many chess moves that are hard to fathom their logic. They may appear as harmless or dubious but the underlying intent is powerful. Later in his life, Fisher would renounce his US citizenship and often criticize his own country. As in chess, surprises are dangerous and fatal. He dies in a foreign country where his game is understood and accepted well. His life is the greatest game I have seen.

He is remembered for his games and life. He resigns from life but he reigns in the minds of those who see his way and world.

Writers strike back (Writers Guild of America)

Since November 5, 2007, the Writers Guild of America (WGA) has walked out of work to protest the unfair cut in the profits and potential share in the sales of their works sold in the internet and other media forms. Many
popular TV shows have been suspended and some major films have been delayed since writers went to strike to demand a better deal in the share of profits. Unfortunately, the strike also has affected the behind-the-scenes crew, decorators, and other personnel involved in the production.

The writers' strike has provided a marxist insight of the power relations between the writers and producers of the TV shows and movies. Who holds the key to production? Who really produces the shows and movies?

The common understanding is that the writers are hired by the producers to make a script. It is clear in this context who is the employer and worker. However, the recent strike has reconfigured the relations between producers and writers and the concept of capital in the hands and minds of the workers. It may seem that the producers hold the power to produce shows and movies because they have the traditional capital which is money and machines. With the walk out of writers from work, the producers lose the power to produce even though they still have the capital. What is then more important and essential in the production of TV shows and movies? Are the hands and minds of writers more essential in this kind of production?

Production is conventionally in the hands of the moneyed and capitalistic individuals, companies and corporations. Workers are hired and paid to produce what the capitalists want. If the workers do not conform with the desires and plans of the capitalists, they go on strike to show their opposition and assert their roles, worth and consequence of their works in the production. The effectiveness of a strike lies in the unity and common sentiments and understanding of the striking workers on their struggle to change the unfair status quo, make a deal favorable to them, and cause the realization of the capitalists of the workers' essential presence in the production.

Thus far, the end and resolution of the writers' strike are nowhere near in sight. There are few writers who were able to make a deal with their producers and now they are back to work. For the many writers still in the
picket line, the struggle continues. At least, they have reconfigured the power relations and the concept of capital in this context. And they have proved that the power of production is also in their hands and minds.

Labor strike hits TV shows

The late nights shows are back! The more popular shows are "Tonight Show" by Jay Leno, "Late Show" by David Lettermen, and "Late Night" by Conan O'Brien.

Writers' strike put them off the air since November 5, 2007. The viewers welcome this news with great enthusiasm as reflected in the viewership ratings. How can't the viewers miss to laugh and enjoy before bedtime? Late
nights are not the same without these familiar shows that have been allowed into the most private part of the house - bedroom.

According to Nielsen Media Research, 7.2 million viewers saw Jay Leno's "Tonight Show" on NBC. David Lettermen's "Late Show" on CBS was seen by 5.5 million people. Conan O'Brien's "Late Night" on NBC had 2.8 million viewers.

Interestingly, both David Letterman and Conan O'Brien have grown their beards to show support for the striking writers. Jay Leno, a writer himself, has shown also support and in fact, he has paid his writers' salary while they are on strike.

The first shows all featured about the strike and, of course, the candidates in the caucuses in Iowa for the presidential election. Then they proceeded to their usual antics and routines that make them likeable and popular among viewers. These shows have catered a great following in the American audience. The have become an integral part of American late nights and popular culture.

However, the first shows did not pass without controversy. Jay Leno, as a writer-member of Writers Guild of America, is said to have violated the rules of the Guild when he delivered his written punchlines in his show. As a rule, Guild members should support the strike. NBC officials retorted that Jay is an exception to the rule. Some Guild members on the other hand will bring the case to the Guild's compliance committee for evaluation. If found guilty, Leno can face fines or, worse, loss of membership in the Guild. Leno's writers are still on strike.

The writers of Lettermen's "Late Show" struck a deal with the producers of the show. The amicable deal caused the writers to be back to work. Some of the shows on CBS were also able to have a deal and their writers are back to their usual stations to work.

As they say, strike or not, the shows must go on. Millions of viewers, not just in the US but all over the world, are glad to see the shows back on the screen to make their nights complete.